<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: procurement + sustainable economic growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickwrightplanning.co.uk/procurement-sustainable-economic-growth.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickwrightplanning.co.uk/procurement-sustainable-economic-growth.htm</link>
	<description>people, place &#38; planning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.nickwrightplanning.co.uk/procurement-sustainable-economic-growth.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2695</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickwrightplanning.co.uk/procurement-sustainable-economic-growth.htm#comment-2695</guid>
		<description>Thanks Richard.  

Worth checking out the Scottish Government&#039;s new Scottish Sustainable Procurement Action Plan, published in October.  It purports to be about helping small and medium sized businesses flourish...

http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/10/sspap#a5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Richard.  </p>
<p>Worth checking out the Scottish Government&#8217;s new Scottish Sustainable Procurement Action Plan, published in October.  It purports to be about helping small and medium sized businesses flourish&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/10/sspap#a5" rel="nofollow">http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/10/sspap#a5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Heggie</title>
		<link>http://www.nickwrightplanning.co.uk/procurement-sustainable-economic-growth.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Heggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickwrightplanning.co.uk/procurement-sustainable-economic-growth.htm#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>Nick
There&#039;s a serious productivity issue here. I hear of consultancies spending days just at the PQQ stage preparing unsuccessful bids, where there are dozens of others in competition. You get a scenario where 25 consultancies spend 2 days or more on a PQQ where the project value is £25,000. Result? The time wasted bidding unsuccessfully is worth twice as much as the project itself. And that&#039;s before shortlisting!
Sadly, there are just too many companies chasing too little work. Fortunately, that doesn&#039;t include Urban Animation! The last bid I got involved in resulted in the work being awarded to the firm everyone expected to get the job right at the beginning of the process. Unlike everyone else, they were &#039;invited to tender&#039;! That&#039;s not to say they weren&#039;t well placed to undertake the work but if there were &#039;preferred&#039; bidders, why wasn&#039;t there a shortlist, avoiding the need for a wasteful PQQ exercise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick<br />
There&#8217;s a serious productivity issue here. I hear of consultancies spending days just at the PQQ stage preparing unsuccessful bids, where there are dozens of others in competition. You get a scenario where 25 consultancies spend 2 days or more on a PQQ where the project value is £25,000. Result? The time wasted bidding unsuccessfully is worth twice as much as the project itself. And that&#8217;s before shortlisting!<br />
Sadly, there are just too many companies chasing too little work. Fortunately, that doesn&#8217;t include Urban Animation! The last bid I got involved in resulted in the work being awarded to the firm everyone expected to get the job right at the beginning of the process. Unlike everyone else, they were &#8216;invited to tender&#8217;! That&#8217;s not to say they weren&#8217;t well placed to undertake the work but if there were &#8216;preferred&#8217; bidders, why wasn&#8217;t there a shortlist, avoiding the need for a wasteful PQQ exercise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
